On 28.02.2013 12:22, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:45:08AM +0000, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-02-28 09:28, Marc Pertron wrote:
We need better optimisations at least as much as fancy 123.tostring.
Bottom line.... optimisation work is just not as sexy and exciting as
adding the latest Delphi/Java/C#/C language features. I guess we can't
blame them for that.
An llvm target will move the optimisation burden away from fpc, which
would be very interesting.
While we would welcome a LLVM backend it is basically a consent in the
development team that this would only be an additional alternative to
the normal backends FPC provides.
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
