A little side note to my statement: > and I don't have a DTD In this case the behaviour of the parser is even right...
W3C: Note: Attributes with the name "ID" or "id" are not of type ID unless so defined ---------------------- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3423430/java-xml-dom-how-are-id-attributes-special But that's not the solution to my problem... :( d.l.i.w _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
