Sorry, the email was interrupted, but sent by the phone in background... So the decision of this "feature" is that it is not worth to add, right?
Thanks. 2013/3/16 Xiangrong Fang <xrf...@gmail.com> > In my example, you can use Items[], but in my real project it is a record > with > > > 发送自魅族MX > > -------- 原始邮件 -------- > 发件人：Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> > 时间：3月16日 17:12 周六 > 收件人：FPC-Pascal users discussions <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> > 主题：Re: [fpc-pascal] a proposal about "with" syntax > > > Am 16.03.2013 07:14 schrieb "Xiangrong Fang" <xrf...@gmail.com>: > > > > Suppose I have the following class: > > > > type > > TMyClass = class > > public > > property Caption: string read FCaption write FCaption; > > property Items[Index: Integer]: string read GetItem write SetItem; > default; > > function Count: Integer; > > end; > > > > I would like to do this: > > > > with MyClassInstance as mci, SomethingElse do begin > > Caption := 'A new caption'; > > for i := 0 to Count - 1 do > > mci[i] := UpperCase(mci[i]); > > end; > > > > That is, to add an optional "as" clause to the with statement so that > access array element in a structure is made easier. > > This was already requested multiple times and also reported on the > bugtracker... Nevertheless in your specific case you can just use > "Items[i]" instead of "mci[i]". > > Regards, > Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
