On 24.03.2013 16:59, silvioprog wrote:
My function is more fast that cHash
(http://fundementals.sourceforge.net/dl.html). The comparison result is:
HMAC: 00:00:01:689 cHash: 00:00:02:038
My final unit is:
http://pastebin.com/4484g9i8
Could you maybe run your unit through some test vectors if you haven't
done already? E.g. these: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4231
If that works satisfactory you could create a bug report and we could
include it in the hash package.
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
