Am 02.05.2013 13:25, schrieb Fred van Stappen:
> that is the slowest system (by a big margin) I have
> available.
Im very interested by the result.
But i continue to think there is something strange with synchronize().
In my logic, synchronize(dummyproc) must have NO effect on the parent
thread.
And it have.
It seems that you didn't read what I wrote. Synchronize always blocks
until the given method was executed by the main thread. So even if your
method is empty there will be a delay until the mainthread processes the
synchronized method. And the more busy the main thread is (e.g. updating
the GUI) the more time it takes until it can process a synchronized
message. Also multiple Synchronize events will be executed in multiple
runs of CheckSynchronize runs, because the "queue" in pre-2.7.1 can only
hold one element. In 2.7.1 the queue can hold multiple methods enqueue
by Synchronize and Queue.
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
