On Fri, July 12, 2013 20:33, Sven Barth wrote: > On 11.07.2013 22:14, Matúš Kudláč wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I want to use Free Pascal 1.0.6 in windows XP Professional 32bit. I >> know to ask some questions about that. Are there some stability problems >> with that version(compiler, IDE, debugger, ...)? If there are can I make >> some changes to make it stable(for example to edit the properties of the >> shortcut). > > Others asked you this already, but just to be on the safe side: Do you > really mean Free Pascal 1.0.6 as released ten years ago or do you mean > Lazarus 1.0.6 (which uses Free Pascal 2.6.2) as released a few weeks ago? > > If it is really the first case then I don't really see anything that > would not work with 2.6.2 that did work in 1.0.6... (except it's > something that relies on implementation details)
Well, I could imagine some potentially relevant cases: 1) Necessity to work with a closed source unit compiled with that version (or unit to which the original sources are lost, which is almost the same ;-) ). 2) Code using lots of assembly and expecting the original calling convention (this falls into your category of "implementation details", but it's an understandable one if it involves large amount of code which would need to be not only modified but possibly also debugged thoroughly because there are more differences than just the way of passing variables - in particular ebx needs to be saved). Although in that case 1.0.10 should be a better option than 1.0.6 - unless the original poster has 1.0.6 only and not 1.0.10 (in the situation when we do not offer this version for download any longer, but I could imagine that finding both would be still possible). Obviously, these are just random shots and pure speculation - the poster clearly stated that he didn't want to disclose the reasons. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal