2013/10/29 Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, silvioprog wrote: > >> 2013/10/28 Graeme Geldenhuys <gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk> >> On Monday 28/10/2013 at 15:03, silvioprog wrote: >> So, which one is recommended to be used in production? >> >> Having recently (and currently still) doing extensive work with embedded >> HTTP servers, I tested many (Powtils, Indy, >> tiWebServer, FPC, nYume etc). I must agree with Michael, fphttpserver is >> a good choice. There is a bit of a learning >> curve [compared to some others], but nothing major. Overall, I'm very >> happy with the final choice on fphttpserver. >> >> Regards, >> Graeme >> >> >> Me too. I'm using fphttpserver in several other projects, and I'm very >> happy. >> >> My new project needs of SSL securit, however, I'm still considering using >> HTTP with another encryption instead of SSL. >> > > https protocol support is on my TODO list. Should hopefully be implemented > before christmas :) > > Michael.
Yyyeeesss, this is an excellent news Michael! :) I'll use this future feature in Brook via broker, then I'll not need to change the code in my projects. -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
