2013/11/18 Mark Morgan Lloyd <markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk>
> There are definitely hazards, but I think that an exists() predicate of
> some form would definitely be useful. For example, inside an {$ifdef
> persist} it would give the developers the ability to have a tailored error
> message advising the maintainer that if persists.pas didn't exist he should
> also get such-and-such a project from local svn, and set up appropriate
> symlinks.
>
> The major issue would be directories and search paths.
That's also what I want to achieve. My original purpose is to reduce
dependencies by put non-critical functions into a separate aux unit while
make the main unit still workable without the aux unit.
As to the search path, I would suggest searching the current path (which
*this* unit resides in), plus the path defined in project options. I also
suggest to disable path component in this proposed directive, i.e.:
{$ifexists some/relative/path/filename.pas} and
{$ifexists /some/absolute/path/filename.pas}
are BOTH NOT allowed, only {$ifexists filename.pas} is allowed.
I don't know if this conforms to fpc traditions or not.
As to the concern about existing ppu or .o file, I think it is not a
problem, because you just follow the normal rule to compare file datetime
of the .o and .pas file. I don't like to rely on make files as fpc has its
own building system.
Xiangrong
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
