My point N°2 regarding potential FPU difference was only concerning instruction
line
e:=c;
=========================
I have absolutely no idea of how the compiler does translate Currency constant
to code, sorry.
May be it uses the FPU when translating from String representation to assembler
value, but I have absolutely no idea where that would be done in the compiler.
Anyway, it may be possible that the compiler uses StrToCurr or something
similar.
var cAsString:string;
.
.
cAsString:=CurrToStr(c);
c:=StrToCurr(cAsString). { <== Check after here on W98 / XP and look for
differences on value c. That uses an FPU instruction fistpll that look as
causing some trouble to other projects (Non FPC) }
.
.
Regards, Bruno
Note : I'm interested to know what you discover since I like using Currency's
var.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
