On 20/06/15 12:01, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Jonas Maebe wrote: > >> On 20/06/15 11:41, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >>> But it is a bug that the compiler does not give an error for the set >>> type. Please report it. >> >> Should it work with any set types at all? (I don't mean set variables, >> but set types) Or even with any type? It seems very much like something >> that was accidentally introduced, like what was reverted with >> http://wiki.freepascal.org/User_Changes_2.6.0#.3COrdinal.3E_in_.3CSet_type.3E_is_now_forbidden > > It should definitely work with sets, that was explicitly asked (I am > sure, because I asked). I use it in my code.
Again: set *variables* or set *types*? Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
