On 29/07/2015 15:44, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:10:23 +0200
From: kapibara<kapibara....@aol.com>
To:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Counting semaphore for free pascal
Message-ID:<55b8b49f.1070...@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Hi all,
@Serguei Thanks for your reply. What you write is probably right, but
let me explain the problem.
Well, the terminology doesn't matter, I'm afraid to start some flood, so
forget it.
Reason I wrote is because I have a feeling the code I wrote could be
improved, or implemented differently altogether.
I see you're using two concepts of synchronization (semaphore and
events) at the same time.
Maybe better to separate them?
It is not clear why use events to limit thread access to service.
Regards,
Serguei
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
