Martin Schreiber wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2015 23:57:30 Bo Berglund wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:19:12 +0100, Martin Schreiber
<mse00...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
matching 2.6.4,
FPC 2.6.4 has no support for EABIHF AFAIK. I have a patched 2.6.4 version
with EABIHF support but I suggest to use FPC 3.0 or fixes_3_0 instead. I
am sure Bo knows where to get it. ;-)
Sources yes, I have checked out something like 4 different source
trees by now.
But the binaries are another deal...
I fear you do not read my mails.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/files/fpcarm/
Agreed, best place to start.
What is EABIHF?
The application binary interface of RaspberryPi.
HF variant of the ARM (E)ABI.
So you think that fixes_3_0 would be a better fpc on my RPi2?
Yes. And I recommend to use cross compiling and debugging from a X86 Linux PC:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus%40lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/msg50406.html
On that we'll have to disagree. The RPi, particularly the 2, is an
entirely adequate computer in its own right.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
