I mark this OT because, this group is surly not interested in this and I am not going to answer on this anymore. We have a saying in Germany: "Wer misst, misst Mist".
cheers, Adrian. Am 18.02.2016 um 12:15 schrieb Serguei TARASSOV: > On 18/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote: >> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:55:29 +0100 >> From: Adrian Veith<adr...@veith-system.de> >> To: FPC-Pascal users discussions<fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> >> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark >> >> I don't want to insist on this, but: if you measure the runtime of your >> program you result = runtime + error. If you measure a series against >> MIN you measure MIN(result) = runtime + MIN(error) which delivers the >> best value for runtime. > Not at all, any series against MIN delivers the best value for > MIN(result) not for runtime! > > Ex. > Prog 1 > Run 1: 130 = 100 + 30 > Run 2: 160 = 100 + 60 > Run 3: 170 = 100 + 70 > Min = 130, Avg = 153 > > Prog 2 > Run 1: 120 = 110 + 10 > Run 2: 150 = 110 + 40 > Run 3: 200 = 110 + 90 > Min = 120, Avg = 157 > > MIN shows that Prog 2 is faster that is wrong. > AVG shows that Prog 1 is faster. > > Regards, > Serguei > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal