Am 24.02.2016 16:44 schrieb "Mark Morgan Lloyd" < markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk>: > > Bo Berglund wrote: >> >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:58:37 +0100, Sven Barth >> <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> What would really help here would be the warning that Jonas mentioned... >>> For the above you could just use a local variable and be done with it. No >>> need to try to "fix" the with-statement. >> >> >> I really fully agree! > > > Perhaps a hint when a single WITH is used and a warning if they're nested. After all, it /is/ a standard part of the language.
A warning when another identifier is shadowed might be more useful as Jonas said. Cause then one could find all problematic identifiers and not just all withs... Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
