On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys < mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2016-03-31 16:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > I usually have a 'Start Application' kind of routine where I register all > > the necessary things, link things together (needed if you follow 'loosely > > coupled' design). > > I do the same. The tiOPF project follows a similar path in the core > framework and its UnitTest suite. It works well. > One could use an alternative approach and have "binding" units. The unit would consist of initialization section only, that does the necessary binding code. They allow to avoid code within "start application" routine across different projects. At the same time they keep the actual library units free of initialization. thanks, Dmitry
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
