2016-05-11 14:23 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org>:
> Where is that written ? As far as I know, it is only there because classes > is there, and classes has some define to allow it to be compiled with fgl. > > by Sven (29 January 2016 10:54 thread "Generics.Collections as package for Lazarus or package for FPC RTL"): "also fgl is a nice test durog cycling the compiler that nothing basic was broken with generics; one of the main reason it's still in rtl and not rtl-objpas or rtl-extra" keeping module in RTL just to have nice test to check compiler cycle is ... very very very strange. > There should not be double standards. > If the consequence is that the fgl unit should move as well: No problem > with that. If we will keep right order then I have no problem with Generics.* as rtl-generics package, and I can realize my plans with compiler in other, more correct way. -- Best regards, Maciej Izak
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal