On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:58 PM, James Richters <
ja...@productionautomation.net> wrote:

> I think there may be a solution with this performance counter for my
> purposes…  here’s what I’m trying to accomplish:
>
Well, Windows provides a different means of waiting (and waiting with time
out) for the Serial port communication.

The whole topic is discussed here:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff802693.aspx#serial_topic1

I'm thinking that using performance counter is a little of over-engineering

thanks,
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to