In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: > > > > why not "record operator"? > > > > Are these advanced neo-records considered classes? > > It's simply that Delphi introduced static methods to records using the same > syntax as for classes and operators followed along. > > We've simply followed that along as we would have needed to do so at least > for mode Delphi anyway and the implementor of advanced records decided not > to deviate from that.
Moreover it doesn't add anything and it only means an extra requirement for editing to change a record to a class and viceversa. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
