In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said: > > In any event, processes on unix are *defined* as owning resources- > memory, handles and so on- while threads only manage control flow. I > believe that MS also have "fibers" which are non-preemptive threads.
They are not really threads. They must be scheduled within threads. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682661(v=vs.85).aspx from the article they don't seem to have that many advantages, except to convert existing manual m:n scheduling apps. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal