Michael Van Canneyt wrote > On Wed, 17 May 2017, fredvs wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> OK, I see that fpc team is afraid to change something that mom-Delphi did >> not do. > > This is simply not correct and a *very* unfair statement on your part. > Mails like this will really not get you anywhere.
Yes, I now. I know also that if you do not speak hot, people does not listen. By the way, I sent advices about size of fpc libraries more than 10 years ago. A lot of "work in progress" as answers but nothing change. A other thing that I discover: it is extremely sensible to talk about linkers. In FreeBSD forum, I was insulted because I reveal that their linker (GNU ld) was not compatible with FreeBSD multi-arch design. But, IMHO, if fpc uses a external linker, it is also part of the compilation process. And each feature of the linker should be analyzed. Michael Van Canneyt wrote > You didn't even file an official request in the bugtracker ? Because I tried already and because I know the (rejected) answer. Michael Van Canneyt wrote > You didn't even test the resources thing. It means we will need to test > this. > This takes time, and the issue is not considered very important, so > this time > is indeed not spent right away. Of course I tested it, why do you write this ? Michael Van Canneyt wrote > With this mail, you're simply behaving like a small girl that didn't get > her > ice cream right away... Ha, so you do not know me. If I do not get my ice cream, I am much more unbearable. Fre;D ----- Many thanks ;-) -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Size-of-program-vs-library-tp5718200p5728656.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal