Linux 64-bit Lazarus 1.9.0 r57948M FPC 3.1.1 x86_64-linux-qt gives

 1.000000000000000000E+00 10000

What is dissassembly for:
  i:=Int64(c);?

I have for Win32:
test_curr_int64.lpr:19            i1 := Int64(c);
0040158D a100c04200               mov    0x42c000,%eax
00401592 a310c04200               mov    %eax,0x42c010
00401597 a104c04200               mov    0x42c004,%eax
0040159C a314c04200               mov    %eax,0x42c014

and for Win64:
test_curr_int64.lpr:19                    i1 := Int64(c);
00000001000015BD 488b0d3caa0300 mov 0x3aa3c(%rip),%rcx # 0x10003c000
00000001000015C4 48b84b598638d6c56d34     movabs $0x346dc5d63886594b,%rax
00000001000015CE 48f7e9                   imul   %rcx
00000001000015D1 48c1fa0b                 sar    $0xb,%rdx
00000001000015D5 48c1e93f                 shr    $0x3f,%rcx
00000001000015D9 4801ca                   add    %rcx,%rdx
00000001000015DC 4889152daa0300 mov %rdx,0x3aa2d(%rip) # 0x10003c010


L.

______________________________________________________________
> Od: LacaK <la...@zoznam.sk>
> Komu: FPC-Pascal users discussions <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>
> Datum: 17.05.2018 13:33
> Předmět: [fpc-pascal] Currency and Int64 casting
>

Hi,

consider following program:

var
  c: currency;

begin
  c := 1;
  writeln(c,' ',Int64(c));
  readln;
end.

FPC 3.0.4
On Win32/x86 I get: 1, 1000  (what I am expecting)
On Win64/x86_64 I get: 1, 1

Is is as expected ?

Is there safe way for both platforms how to get 1000 (beside that I can
use: i: int64 absolute c;)

Thanks

-Laco.

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to