Am 21.05.2018 um 01:36 schrieb Maciej Izak:
2018-05-21 0:52 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org <mailto:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>>:

    The thing is that I can easily imagine the Delphi devs to be so
    stoned to use the "[...]" for static arrays inside dynamic arrays
    as well which could lead to constructs like the following because
    they forget that dynamic arrays could be part of static arrays as
    well:

    === code begin ===

    var
      v: array[0..2] of array of array[0..2] of LongInt = ([[1, 2, 3],
    [4, 5, 6]], [], [[7, 8, 9]]);

    === code end ===

    Yes, I have absolutely no confidence in the Delphi developers.


Sometimes they have fantasy ^^. Don't underestimate them, I am sure they can do something more unexpected ;) For NewPascal mode I see this like :

var
  v: array[0..2] of array of array[0..2] of LongInt = ([(1, 2, 3), (4, 5, 6)], [], [(7, 8, 9)]);

That is at least what I would *expect* for Delphi as well. And no, I'm definitely not underestimating their ability to come up with strange syntaxes... Do I do prefer not to think about it too much to avoid nightmares :P

    I don't want to use a modeswitch for every tiny little bit of
    feature. What we could do however would be a modeswitch for a
    strict Delphi mode that prohibits extensions and code that does
    not work in Delphi (like global operators and global generic
    functions). This could be used for code that is shared with Delphi
    to avoid potentially breaking compilability with Delphi if one is
    mainly using FPC for testing.


IMO potentially breaking compatibility is better than lock/prohibition for missing features in Delphi (or waiting for Delphi implementation). Programmers are not stupid and most of Delphi users knows what Delphi have and what can be potentially risky. We have tons of examples which should be disabled in Delphi mode but it works for comfort. r39045 is for sure not comfortable IMO without real important reason, but this is just my opinion.

I've decided to lift the restriction again in r39078. Happy now?

Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to