It is not a problem it just makes it a bit tricky tracking memory usage
because of the delay between releasing the memory and it the reported
heap usage decreasing. I haven't had a good look at the source but
maybe there is some way to take these pending releases into account.
Thanks for your input.
On 18/06/2018 3:36 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 17.06.2018 um 16:40 schrieb Fabio Luis Girardi:
Em Dom, 17 de jun de 2018 05:48, Florian Klämpfl
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
No. It is added to the "wait for free" queue of the thread which
initially allocated it.
So, excluding the performance penalty, this is not a problem?
Why should it be a problem?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
