> On Sep 4, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Ryan Joseph <r...@thealchemistguild.com> wrote:
>
> // what happens here? is this a wrong type error (TObject is expected but got
> TWrapper) or do we assign directly to the base record? I can see it both ways
> so I’m not sure what principle to fall back on. Allow it because we can or
> prevent it because it’s not intended functionality?
> wrapper := other;
Sorry I didn’t think enough before I sent this.
We *must* allow this assignment to make operator overloads work. += operators
are also basically assigning TWrapper to TWrapper, right? I guess we need to
break the default property behavior is instances that the same type is being
assigned to itself but correct me if I’m wrong.
var
wrapper: TWrapper;
wrapper += 10;
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
