Am Do., 15. Nov. 2018, 08:39 hat Ryan Joseph <r...@thealchemistguild.com> geschrieben:
> > > > On Nov 15, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal < > fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> wrote: > > > > They are only useful when interacting with the external runtime. On > other OSes nothing would support them thus there is no use for them. > Additionally this requires extensive runtime, not to mention Objective C > support. > > There is even less sense in trying to port them as Object Pascal has > anonymous functions which are already Work In Progress for FPC. > > I see, that’s too bad. Anonymous functions appear to be dead as far as I > can tell. In progress since 2012 I think? > Unlike you I'm in active contact with the developer and the last message was only a few months ago. > Would it be permitted to add inline declarations of nested functions as a > temporary replacement? They don’t capture state but at least they solve the > issue of polluting namespace with named functions which you use in only one > location. Better than nothing (since that’s what we’re realistically > looking at) and no new complicated features. > No. This would conflict with the work of Blaise. Also even if we'd add that now it would not make 3.2 as it would be a too invasive change. So the earliest release would be 3.4 and for that I plan to have the real thing integrated into trunk. Thus it would be wasted effort to add that now. Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
