Am So., 6. Jan. 2019, 22:38 hat Ryan Joseph <r...@thealchemistguild.com> geschrieben:
> Since we introduced “const” keywords to generic params does it make sense > to use an optional “type” keyword also? That just occurred to me as > something worth discussing. No opinion either way except there’s a > inconsistency now which may bother some people. > > generic TStuff<type T; const A> = record end; > We can always add it in later if we think it's needed. Let's keep it out for now. Regards, Sven >
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
