> On Jun 26, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Ben Grasset <operato...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think Ryan probably meant his own custom types. And certainly, you can do
> some interesting stuff with operator overloading that mostly avoids the
> normal AnsiString overhead. Here's an example.
Yes indeed. FPC already has an overwhelming amount of string types. As I said
though a SetCapacity option for growing would be nice (for dynamic arrays also)
because += is such a common operation. As it stands I often don’t use dynamic
arrays (and now ansistring) because of growing limitations, which is a shame
really.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
