On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:08 +0200, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote: > ... > There is no default configuration, because there is not one default > standard. ...
Understood. > Rule of thumb is that contributions should fit into the existing > style. <digress>In general when it comes to programming it is better to let programmers focus on content, not style (especially when there is supposed to only be one style in a given source file). One could argue that lack of standardization (and tools to enforce thos standards) cause programmers to do menial tasks that computers can do much better at....</digress> I guess I will need to make my own configs for ptop if I don't want to be forced to manually focus on style... It seems ptop does not understand function/procedure modifiers. https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu3.html Maybe it does support/understand those, I'll just need to dig through the configs, as theire is mention of "modifier" or "modifiers" in the default config output. Of hand I don't see a "nocrbefore", but I see functions have a type as the last item, but no modifiers... The default config for ptop does not understand asm, but there is blank entry for it, and I see that giving it the same rules as begin works fine. Is there a more robust code reformatter (command line / batch oriented) that can used with free pascal? (before I start digging in to making ptop work to remove one's focus from style and put it solely on content?) Sincerely, Dwight Schauer _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
