> On Feb 15, 2022, at 5:15 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> It contains a capture object that backs the method.
> If nothing is captured and the right hand side is a direct function or method
> pointer then the compiler could in principle create something that is
> essentially static to avoid allocations, but that would be a future
> optimization.
>
So if we do this there is nothing being captured right? In that case we get an
interface which can call a function pointer? Does the interface then know about
"of object" and "is nested" types at all or does it use a totally different
mechanism to call those?
================
type
TMyAction = reference to procedure;
procedure MyAction;
begin
end;
procedure Test;
begin
DoThis(@MyAction);
end;
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
