Hi,
I noticed this too a few years ago when I translated xxHash from C to FPC.
Pushing the code to less lines improved speed so xxHash32 was as fast as in C.
do { v1 = XXH32_round(v1, XXH_get32bits(input)); input += 4; v2 = XXH32_round(v2,
XXH_get32bits(input)); input += 4; v3 = XXH32_round(v3, XXH_get32bits(input));
input += 4; v4 = XXH32_round(v4, XXH_get32bits(input)); input += 4; } while (input
< limit);
repeat
v1 := cPrime32x1 * RolDWord(v1 + cPrime32x2 * PLongWord(ABuffer)^, 13);
v2 := cPrime32x1 * RolDWord(v2 + cPrime32x2 * PLongWord(ABuffer+4)^,
13);
v3 := cPrime32x1 * RolDWord(v3 + cPrime32x2 * PLongWord(ABuffer+8)^,
13);
v4 := cPrime32x1 * RolDWord(v4 + cPrime32x2 * PLongWord(ABuffer+12)^,
13);
inc(ABuffer, 16);
until not (ABuffer <= pLimit);
______________________________________________________________
Od: "James Richters via fpc-pascal" <[email protected]>
Komu: "'FPC-Pascal users discussions'" <[email protected]>
Datum: 09.11.2022 13:47
Předmět: [fpc-pascal] Program efficiency
I was wondering if breaking up large complicated formulas into smaller
sections that use more variables is less efficient than just the large
formula.
In other words.. is
A:=(B+C/D)-E^F;
G:=H*(I+J);
K:=L+M/N;
O:= A+G-K;
Less efficient than
O:= ((B+C/D)-E^F)+ (H*(I+J))-(L+M/N);
James
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
<https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal>
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
