Andrei Tchijov wrote: > If you indicate how exactly you want to handle "irradication" of glib, I > am more then happy to help. I was going to do it by myself, but it is > much better to have this kind of changes in the "official" sources.
I think we should wait until I've ported the library to fpusb as there may be some glib features that become useful there. And maybe we should even wait until I've added thread safety (planned for later). From that point, I don't envision any more major internal changes so then we could consider glib's involvement again. > What exactly wrong with NBIS? Am I correct (based on your statement > below) that it has problems with small images? How small? Is imageMagik > used only to up-sample image? Yes. I don't know much, imagemagick was the quick solution. In addition to enlarging AES4000 images, we have dropped the matching thresholds in aes4000, aes1610 and upektc, and even then it doesn't work as well as the devices with larger sensors. http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/NBIS_adventures >> It's the only one that works that I know about :) > > Have you looked at this folks? > > http://www.griaule.com > > It is not open source, but you can get SDK. They claim that they > outperform NIST. I'm not interested in closed solutions. I should have included the words "open source" :) Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
