Sounds quite reasonable. What about win32-libusb folks? Are they "on-board" with this new development?
On Jan 2, 2008, at 07:52 , Daniel Drake wrote: > Andrei Tchijov wrote: >> I think in a long run this is really good news. >> Now, what are your thoughts on interoperability of "old" libusb and >> "new" one? Will you try to have some sort of interoperability or >> are you planing to have 'clean slate' implementation (as far as I >> remember, fpusb was not very similar to libusb)? > > It will be a new API, new library filename, new header filename, > etc. It will be possible to install libusb-1.0 and libusb-0.1 > alongside each other. > > I will also develop a "libusb01compat" package, which will provide > the libusb-0.1 header file, library with same name, etc, but > internally it will just translate libusb-0.1 calls into their 1.0 > equivalents. > > Daniel _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
