Why do programs always have to "go" somewhere to be worth using? As long a company supports it's products, tries to fix the bugs and is keeping up with other tools of it's kind, there does not have to be a major overhaul in each version. That's the myth that software companies like to perpetuate, in order to give people reasons to keep upgrading to new versions. I think it's mostly psychological.
Do you buy a new car every time the next year's model comes out with a few new features? Regards, Shmuel Wolfson Peter Gold wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Bill Swallow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> They just invested a ton of work into not only FM8 but also to RH 6 so >> the two tools can work together. >> >> This topic comes up regularly, and yet FM hasn't gone anywhere. >> > > This could fit nicely into a thread on a tech-writer's list about > words with double meanings. > > Does "hasn't gone anywhere" mean "FrameMaker development has been > static while the world around it has moved on," or does it mean, > "FrameMaker is still here in the building, and performing its heart > out, live, 24x7x365?" > > Regards, > > Peter > _______________________________ > Peter Gold > KnowHow ProServices > _______________________________________________ > > > You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/sbw%40actcom.com > > Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. > > _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
