As promised in an earlier post to the framers list, here are some concerns I 
have about the FM 11 codeview mode. I am also copying this to 
framemaker-d...@yahoogroups.com since it falls in that domain. Maybe I am 
missing something easy that would solve these issues. I would be happy to be 
made aware of ways of dealing with them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I
 find myself working in the FM11 codeview mode a lot and have the following 
complaints: I wish FM would leave my indenting alone and not collapse 
everything (or some things).I wish FM would not added navtitles and metadata 
tags that I don't need. This seems to happen when I save after returning to the 
WYSIWYG view (which I try not to do for that reason).The codeview interface 
often lacks a scroll bar when you enter it. Hitting the minimized and then 
maximize window icons gets them, but that should be fixed so you don't have to 
do that.
One more trying aspect of the current implementation: Since I am converting 
files to DITA I often work with a non-structured file open to consult or 
sometimes cut-and-paste from. This file disappears when I move to codeview, 
which makes sense since it does not have a structure with text to view. 
Returning to WYSIWYG mode always returns the file to a docked tab, so I have to 
reposition it to the other monitor again and again. Can't these windows just be 
left where they were placed? Enough for now. Craig Ede                          
                 
_______________________________________________


You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
  • [no subject] Craig Ede

Reply via email to