And on the other side of the fence... I find it an interesting discussion. And I prefer to have it on this list since I don't participate in many other lists.
Sorry, Matt, my vote is for keep it online. Nadine > >Bandwidth is measured also by the number of emails one can reasonably read >(and respond to) in a given length of time. > > >I can't be the only person who is tired of reading about reactions to the CS >licensing model on this FrameMaker forum… > > >I don't know anything about Adobe's plans. > > >Everyone's time is worth (and costs) something…the time required to >participate and/or read these discussions thus have a cost, so I'm asking... >perhaps those with a keen interest in the topic could take the discussion of >it offline or to a CS-oriented list until Adobe indicates this will affect >FrameMaker? > > >I'm happy to discuss this off-list, but as a courtesy, will be avoiding this >thread (even more) going forward. > > >-Matt > > > >On Jul 17, 2013, at 11:49 PM, "Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)" ><syed.hos...@aeris.net> wrote: > >In this day and age, is Internet “bandwidth” use for text e-mails really an >issue? J >> >>Plus, are you saying that you know/believe that FrameMaker is not going to be >>released as a cloud-based license model soon? Love to hear the news. >> >>And, in my opinion, btw, my discussion (feel free to call it whining perhaps? >>:)) on license cost/models of FrameMaker is fair game for this mailing list … >> >>Z _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
