At 16:42 -0800 3/11/06, Dov Isaacs wrote: >No, Adobe Reader really isn't a "stand-alone program that >can co-exist in multiple versions."
Ok, fair enough. You should know. It just looks that way on the Mac. >Installation of Reader includes browser plug-ins, icon-handlers, >file associations, registry entries, etc. all of which are >candidates for conflicts. Yeah, Windows sounds like a real minefield ;-) >Installation of Reader includes browser plug-ins, icon-handlers, >file associations, registry entries, etc. all of which are >candidates for conflicts. Right. >For the full Acrobat product, the web is even more tangled with >PostScript driver plug-ins, port monitors, etc. Hmmm. Voluntarily 'upgrading' a working Ps workflow sounds risky, as this stuff is mission-critical for a lot of people. But then, being on FrameMaker for Mac, I'm stuck with the AdobePS driver under Classic - which works ;-) -- Steve
