To each his own, I guess. It doesn't bother me one whit, aesthetically or any other way--in fact, quite the opposite, because, as I said before, it signals to me that it was, in fact, NOT a misprint or misfeed of paper, especially if both a running header AND footer are used.
I respect the opinions and thoughts of others on this topic who have contributed, but I can't help wondering if their offerings are based on their own subjective experiences--as mine are, I admit freely--or more objective research. For instance, why would anyone, seeing both a printed header and footer (with no intervening content), assume or suspect that there was a glitch in the printing process? It just doesn't make sense to me. Obviously, there is no perfect solution here, only whatever one might consider optimal. On that score, I stand by my original assertions and happily acknowledge others' rights to do the same. Isn't freedom a wonderful thing? Chuck Beck -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:framers-bounces+charles.beck=infor.com at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Whites Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:17 AM To: framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: The Page Left Intentionally Blank Isn't there also a matter of aethetics? An empty chapter end page consisting only on a header and a footer is, in my estimation, an eyesore and an embarrassment. will white ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. - Twain ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as Charles.Beck at infor.com. Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/charles.beck%40infor .com Send administrative questions to lisa at frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
