At 11:50 -0500 10/4/07, Mike Wickham wrote:

>Grasping at straws, here, but I vaguely recall a problem I had with similar 
>reference line. After testing it, I had decided that I wanted to move the line 
>up closer to the text it followed. So I went to the reference page to tweak 
>it. I can't absolutely recall the problem my tweaking caused-- except that the 
>line was not falling where I expected-- but I do remember the fix. It turned 
>out that, instead of selecting the line and moving it up closer to the top 
>border of its reference frame, I had selected the reference frame and moved 
>the top of it down closer to the line. Apparently, this didn't remove space 
>between the line and the top of the reference frame, it only hid the extra 
>space from my eye. FrameMaker still managed to find that space and display it 
>on the body page.

Good idea, but no: this line is very carefully positioned, and under 1600% zoom 
it's well clear of the top of the reference frame, by about 0.4 mm.


At 11:52 -0500 10/4/07, Peter Gold wrote:
>Hi, Art:

Steve...

>Is it possible that the character tag used in the bullet paragraph has a 
>font-size attribute that varies sometimes, perhaps due to a rounding error? 
>Similarly, have you looked at the line-space (leading) and font size of the 
>paragraph format?

They are 11.5 point and 10.5 point Frutiger.

>Oh, and one more thing: in a narrow column, perhaps the width of the reference 
>frame is bumping into the column and pseudo-wrapping to the lower position.

Reference frame is 1 mm shorter than table column width. Maybe I should make it 
a lot shorter.

>Have you tried using an anchored frame below, with a rule, instead of the 
>reference frame, just to see if it's stable?

Nope. I guess I could try that, but I'm pretty much done working with these 
files now, and as the bug only manifests itself occasionally, so occasionally 
that I cannot put my finder on what triggers it, it might take me a while to 
even know if this was stable. As this under-rule is only used on a single para 
per document, there doesn't seem to be a lot of point in having it on the 
reference page anyway.

Thanks, everyone.

-- 
Steve

Reply via email to