But the point remains that the best way to prepare depends greatly on what your goals and objectives are. Just as one example, if you are not planning to adopt topic-oriented authoring and topic-level reuse, then spending time learning about DITA would be a digression rather than progress toward whatever your real objective is.
There are many different things that can be accomplished by the implementation and use of structure, and it is not necessary to know a lot about the techniques and workflows that don't relate to your specific business need. My opinions only; I don't speak for Intel. Fred Ridder (fred dot ridder at intel dot com) Intel Parsippany, NJ -----Original Message----- From: framers-bounces+fred.ridder=intel....@lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces+fred.ridder=intel.com at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Milan Davidovic Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:09 AM To: Frame Users Subject: Re: anticipating a move to Structrued Frame --- Marcus Carr <mcarr at allette.com.au> wrote: > Why do you want to go to structured data? Good question (and good thoughts on the question), but that's a different topic. For the purposes of this topic, let's imagine that the reasons are sound. And in case I forget to mention it later, thanks for all your answers. Milan http://altmilan.blogspot.com http://www.terminus1525.ca/studio/view/2758