Just to clarify when I said "unnecessary" in Frame--I meant for MY workflow experience. I like all my numbering schemes to be labeled independent of each other--it keeps the code simpler for each style and it makes it easier to add deeper levels to each style group.
I label my tables and figures separately, T: and F: respectively, so I don't need the space holders. Also, I label only my headings with the H: label, so I can look at the style names to know how many levels there are. (As mentioned, the Chapter doesn't really matter if it is labeled or not since it only has the chapnum code.) My internal numbered lists are typically N: and Step lists are usually S:. I've seen templates using an "all-in-one" numbering scheme that had about 20-odd placeholders for various numbering schemes throughout the book with no information as to what each place is actually used for. It made adding in new heading levels a real PIA. I didn't mean to denigrate anybody's workflow. There is nothing technically wrong with either system, but I personally feel that trouble-shooting separately labeled number groups is a lot easier. Dave Creamer IDEAS Training _______________________________________________ This message is from the Framers mailing list Send messages to [email protected] Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com Send administrative questions to [email protected]
