I wouldn't bother looking at WebWorks if RoboHelp's output is acceptable. At my last job we switched because RoboHelp output looked lousy and there was browser-specific bugs Adobe didn't fix, but that was RH9 ten years ago.
WebWorks' HTML output looked much better and seemed bug-free. It was also much easier to manage the source in Subversion. On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 12:45 AM Orly Zimmerman <or...@xsightlabs.com> wrote: > HI Robert, > This is also what I've found - linking FM source files to generate the > online help. > My team started me off using FM because they wanted PDF deliverables - > silicon documentation are hefty books and FM keeps them all wrapped up very > nicely and very stable - publishes fine PDFs that can be jointly reviewed > easily, so all that is good, and very important for us. > On the other hand, now marketing is thinking about moving to online help. > Since I have the Tech Suite, I have RH included within my tools. > Do you think Webworks would justify its expense, or what advantage would > it have, if any over RH 2020? > To be fair, I understand that Adobe revamped RH from scratch, so I'm > hoping it can do a fine job (haven't tested it yet, but on the other hand, > I haven't used any online tools yet either). > Just checking to see what added advantages you, or if anyone else would > like to chime in) think Webworks has. > _______________________________________________ This message is from the Framers mailing list Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com
