I spotted a bug but forgot to make the change before submitting the patch, line 128 of the patch should be a +4 not a -4 as this will work out the length of the data then it needs to add 4 on to include the revision, pad and length field.
Robin On 17/03/2008, Robin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > I've done some work on getting a Scruby EAPOL dissector working but > to do that I've also had to write a basic radiotap dissector as well. > > I've had a couple of issues in doing it, my LLC packet is different > to the one Scruby is currently expecting, mine has an extra two > parameters so I've created an LLCx dissector which nearly works for > my packets except a small problem I've commented in the code. > > I tried sending this to Sylvain but he is too busy to look at it at > the moment so suggested I forward it to the list. Hopefully this is > useful to someone else out there. It does the job I needed but I know > that it is a long way from finished so hopefully someone can take it > and do something more with it or if I get time I'll try to improve it. > > > Robin > > _______________________________________________ Framework-Hackers mailing list Framework-Hackers@spool.metasploit.com http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework-hackers
