On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 10:00 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Raphael Ritz wrote: > > Up to now we have PIL as a soft dependency in Plone/AT > > so the question is whether this change is intended or just > > an oversite. > > > > As PIL isn't part of a standard Python distribution I personally > > would prefer to keep this a soft dependency. > > Considering the amount of problems users report who don't have PIL > installed and the fact image handling pretty much already requires it > (esp. with the current kupus offering resized images) perhaps making > PIL a hard dependency is worth it.
I see your point but I would like to avoid an hard dependency on PIL.
vds
--
Vincenzo Di Somma
REFLAB srl
design, development and consulting
T: +39 349 756 54 60 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.reflab.com
Weblog: http://www.reflab.com/blogs/vdsblog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
