> > - Both the Navigation and Search control panel does not show
> > the "Friendly types" list, but uses the full list instead,
> > should be fixed (user does not know what a ChangeSet or
> > Relative Path Criterion type is ;)
>
> We need to be careful with this so that we don't make it impossible to
> support certain configurations, e.g. to be able to list a particular
> content type in the navtree, but not search on it. Also, isn't the list
> of types managed in the Search control panel actually the "friendly
> types" list itself? In that case, you have a chicken-and-egg problem.
Yes, we need to un-nest this somehow, I just left it here so we would
remember to look into it.
IMO, there are certain types that should be blacklisted from all of
these lists (ChangeSet, Criteria, etc) since they are not actually
addable types, but just side effects of the implementation strategy.
If "friendly types" is related to the search blacklisting at all, I
have misunderstood how this works. I didn't think it did. :)
I'm not sure I'd want to make this part of 3.0; such refactoring at
this stage could be risky and boring. :)
Let's take a pragmatic look at it and work out what's achievable
without introducing new properties and new lists of things.
> > - Don't install the following by default:
> > - Content Rules
>
> We talked about this before. This isn't easily possible right now,
> because it's just a registration of a local utility + a control panel,
> which happens during site setup. I'm not sure I care to productize it
> and make it installable/uninstallable when it's an admin-only function
> anyway. Regular users should never see it. If you want to disable the
> management of content rules, you can turn off the appropriate
> permission; it may be useful to have some kind of global "turn off
> content rule execution" switch, though. I don't know where you'd manage
> this from, but if it were somewhere other than the "Content rules"
> controlpanel, then it'd be possible to turn off the CR control panel
> with that switch as well.
Right, also an old note that made it in. A global "enable content
rules" checkbox in the Content Rules panel is more than good enough.
Cool. I've got a few contentrules fixups in the pipeline, will look at
them then.
> > - Preferrably move the Collections (Smart Folder) control panel
> > to a ZMI version, since it is very complex and not something
> > site admins are likely to need
>
> I assume you mean *not* likely to need.
I mean "not something they are likely to need". It's the same. At
least in my brain. ;)
Note to self: Don't reply to emails before breakfast.
> > - Only show the Display/Add/WF pulldowns on the View screen
> > - Possibly remove the border on initial creation forms (ie.
> > keep the actual green border, but remove everything
> > clickable on it, since it causes errors)
>
> +1
I think you're the only one that understands this code at the moment,
so if you could look into this, it would be appreciated.
It's quite easy, I think. If I forget, remind me again. :)
In the formlib add form world, we actually turn off the border in its
entirety (i.e. disable_border=True in the request) when adding
objects. I think we need to do the same for AT based objects.
In the formlib world, it makes no sense at all to have tabs, because
before the object is added, there is no object to have tabs for! The
tabs that appear would be those for the parent folder, which makes no
sense.
At least when using portal factory, we are trying to fake add forms,
so I think the semantics should be the same. To the user, there is no
object until the "add form" is submitted. ;)
> > - "You are adjusting the sharing privileges for a default view, to
> > adjust them for the entire container, go here."
>
> ?
Just the wording for the message that needs to show up if you are
trying to set Sharing privileges for the default view of a folder. It
doesn't exist at the moment (the entire Sharing page seems broken for
some reason at the moment, I get a KSS spinner, but nothing happens).
Gah. :)
Martin
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
