On Dec 18, 2007, at 9:44 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Tom Lazar wrote:same here, unless you can work something out (perhaps together withhanno) along the lines of the 'optional' migration steps that hanno has mentioned. i.e. folks could choose to include this update in 3.1 if theyknow they haven't customized search.any ideas on that? hanno? wiggy?I won't have time to do any work for the 3.1 deadline. Hopefully I'llhave more time again for 3.2, but I cannot commit to anything here rightnow. Given an optional migration strategy is available this could be 3.x material in my non-voting opinion ;)
i think so, too. so i'd be +1 if the grouping can be made optional. maybe it's possible to not change, but just extend the search view, so that the grouping only gets used by the new template, but the old one plus its customizations won't break?
cheers, andi -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779 pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/ plone 3.0.4 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
