Hi team mates, just a quick question regarding how we want to organize the review:
While the deadline for submission is only next Saturday (Jan 19) we do already have some PLIP implementations submitted: http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip195-dependencies http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/optilude-plipathon-184-200-203-204 http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/optilude-plip202 http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip205-portlettypes-multiplemanagers http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip207-custom-portlet-managers http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip218-addable-portlets-restrictions-and-changes and some where I'm not exactly sure but where I think it makes sense to start looking at more closely: http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/dreamcatcher-plip187 http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip208-localroles http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/plip217-workflow Now in the interest of time I think it makes perfect sense to start seriously looking at those submitted already. Ideally, everyone from the team should look at everything but often this simply doesn't work out so we might want to make sure we spit the work such that all PLIPs get consideration from at least two or three team members. Questions or issues arising should of course be brought to the attention of the entire team, e.g., by posting them here. I offer to first look more closely at Wichert's GS dependency handling as well as Martin's stuff. I might also be able to comment on Sidnei's WebDAV work (though I can't test on Windows; Linux and Mac only here). What do others think? Raphael _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team