Hi Whit, The current procedure is that the framework team recommends a release manager to the board, which does the hiring and paying.
At the DC meeting, the framework team members decided that a team for 4.0 would be recruited (the 3.x team would continue to operate) and would nominate a release manager. Alex is basically proposing that we shortcut the process by naming Hanno interim release manager, pending formal confirmation by the 4.0 team. I'm not a member of the framework team, but did join the DC meeting. The purpose of talking about the procedures was to get things moving, not to hinder us. Given Hanno's stature in the community, if the existing framework team and alums concur on him, I see absolutely no problem in moving forward. Steve On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:49 AM, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is there some sort of voting process for release manager now? in the > past, the board has just picked a manager and sometimes even paid them > ;) > > -w > > -- > <=> > david "whit" morriss > opengeo -- http://opengeo.org > > "If you don't know where you are, > you don't know anything at all" > > Dr. Edgar Spencer, Ph.D., 1995 > > _______________________________________________ > Framework-Team mailing list > Framework-Team@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team > -- Steve McMahon Reid-McMahon, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
