On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 17:15, Steve McMahon <st...@dcn.org> wrote:
> 1) Should there be a significant new feature release of Plone this
> year? What are its most basic goals? Which framework team is in
> charge?

Hanno already outlined the goals, I'd say go with those.

I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x team for this; this team already has
the mindset to get this going; the future plone team (trunk team?) is
focusing on vision right now, which I think may not be what's needed
for an in-between team.

> 2) What should this new release be called/numbered?

I'd still go for a 4.0 number here; anything in the 3.x range would
add confusion about stability, a promise I wouldn't be willing to
break.

> You've had a lot of feedback on the numbering question from the dev
> and docs lists. May I suggest that you seek some additional feedback
> from the Marketing Committee? Version numbering is not just technical,
> it's a matter of expectations and perception. The Marketing team may
> be able to give you some feedback on the confusion or perception
> problems that might result from one choice or another. Give them a
> deadline for giving feedback.

+1

-- 
Martijn Pieters

_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

Reply via email to