Hi,
I've just submitted for review plip #9286, and I'll be wrapping up PLIP
#9329 until the end of the day. I hope it won't be too late to include
it into the review process. Sorry for the delay :)
Thanks,
Ricardo
Eric Steele wrote:
The following 27 PLIPs have been indicated as being ready for review:
7822 Make standard file content types use ZODB BLOB support
8801 Move action icon support into actions, remove CMFActionIcons
8802 Move our upgrade / migration infrastructure to GenericSetup
8808 Require Python 2.5 or 2.6, Zope 2.12, and CMF 2.2 for Plone 4.0
8814 Replace SecureMailHost with a standard Zope mailhost
9186 Set Image IDs from Title field
9214 Support logins using e-mail address instead of user id
9249 Add TinyMCE as the default visual editor
9250 Add jQuery Tools to base install
9256 Expand variable substitution in mailing action of
plone.app.contentrules
9258 Replace Products.ATReferenceBrowserWidget with
archetypes.referencebrowserwidget
9259 Group dashboards
9263 GenericSetup syntax for importing Sharing page roles
9264 Merge backport patches from plone.app.dexterity into Plone
9272 Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties
9284 Allow views to override skin layer elements easily
9285 Show blocked portlets in management interface
9288 Improved commenting infrastructure
9295 Improved UI for collections (merged with 9283 for review: A
more lightweight backend for collections)
9305 Use real names instead of usernames
9309 Better search for East Asian (multi-byte) languages.
9316 Unify folder implementations
9321 Reimplement the search form with an eye on usability
9327 Unified interface for lists of content
9330 Add ability to choose role when adding new site members
9352 Search results improvements
We also have 2 PLIPs that depend on the outcome of the theme PLIP and
will require a later review:
8805 Do not ship with NuPlone anymore
9300 Well formed, valid XHTML
And two that are installer options:
9314 Plone "Developer Pack" option for installers
9322 Ensure that Plone 4 can upgrade Zope on Windows and Mac OS X
via binary eggs
(See our spreadsheet for the full list of PLIPs
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rR4UAIObeTZtdUExfYophHw)
If we stick with the 2 reviewers/PLIP that we'd discussed last week,
that means at least 6 reviews per FWT member. I'm going to make the
assumption that you'll want some help with these. I think there are
some cases where we'd be best served having one FWT review and one
external review for a PLIP. Hanno has offered to pitch in and I'd like
to see him review David's backporting PLIPs. Some would benefit
greatly from a UI team reviewer (do we need a UI review of the
collections work since half of the UI team worked on it?)
I've also asked accessibility evangelist Christian Vinten-Johansen
here at WebLion to look at some of these for possible accessibility
issues.
If there are others you'd like to bring in, let me know and I'll make
it happen.
Our deadline for reviews is August 30. We can discuss the feasibility
of that during Wednesday's call.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
--
Ricardo Alves <r...@eurotux.com>
Eurotux <http://www.eurotux.com>
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
