#9288: Improved commenting infrastructure
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: timo | Owner: timo
Type: PLIP | Status: reopened
Priority: minor | Milestone: 4.1
Component: Infrastructure | Resolution:
Keywords: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by timo):
Replying to [comment:51 eleddy]:
> Replying to [comment:50 timo]:
> Nice work! I am super gung ho about authenticated being able to comment.
In default installs you will rarely see authenticated users who aren't
members and in custom environments using the member role is unlikely.
Curious what others think.
>
> Thanks!
I checked the implementation and added some tests and documentation.
plone.app.discussion basically checks for the 'Reply to item' permission
to decide when to show the comment form. By default, this permission is
granted to the "Member", "Reviewer" and "Manager" role but not to
"Authenticated". If integrators want to allow discussion for
"Authenticated" they can just add this permission to the role. Though, I
agree that this could cause confusion when the user is authenticated and
discussion is enabled.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9288#comment:52>
Plone <http://plone.org>
Plone Content Management System
_______________________________________________
PLIP-Advisories mailing list
plip-advisor...@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plip-advisories
